Comments on: On trial: ‘The Case for Christ,” part 1

By: Apologetics Considered « A Robin Hood's Musing

Apologetics Considered « A Robin Hood's Musing — Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:38:54 +0000

[...] ‘The Case for Christ’ on trial: part I (jeremystyron.com) [...]

By: On trial: ‘The Case for Christ,’ part 3a - Our Daily Train | By Jeremy Styron at Our Daily Train | By Jeremy Styron

Thu, 25 Oct 2012 02:00:41 +0000

[...] series on Lee Strobel‘s, “The Case for Christ.” If you missed them, you can read Part 1 here and Part 2 [...]

By: Is Apologetics Really Necessary? « Parchment Paradigm+

Is Apologetics Really Necessary? « Parchment Paradigm+ — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 07:09:15 +0000

[...] ‘The Case for Christ’ on trial: part I (jeremystyron.com) [...]

By: papapound

papapound — Sun, 30 Sep 2012 23:17:52 +0000

I tend to think that the "counter" to all the scholars he questioned and interviewed was his former atheism, that is, his former belief system. He is on a journey to find out if there is evidence for what he assumes he discovered already through his own personal research.

By: jeremystyron

jeremystyron — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:37:33 +0000

Thanks Greg. Hope you enjoy the series. "The Case for Christ" appeals mostly to "surface" Christians who don't want to think too hard about why they believe and just want their faith confirmed for them. Strobel, if he does anything, succeeds in that regard. As for a critical analysis, I think I will show that it falls pretty hard.

By: Greg Strockbine

Greg Strockbine — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:27:18 +0000

I'm looking forward to your series on the Case For Christ.
My sister gave me the book, but I never read it. She cites
it as one of the reasons she is a believer. I myself, am not
a believer.