Falling down a wormhole courtesy Alvin Plantinga

 from over at the Cross Examined blog on Patheos recently considered philosopher and Christian apologist Alvin Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism, which essentially states that if evolution is true, human cognitive function developed in such a way as to support survival, but not necessarily beliefs as truth. Thus, according to this argument, how can we trust what we think we know about the world? And if we can’t trust our own ability to glean truth reliably, God must be the conduit by which we mere humans can know things.

As Seidensticker phrased it:

In brief, the question is: how can a human mind that’s the result of the clumsy process of evolution be trusted? About “Darwin’s doubt,” Plantinga argues that only Christians can have confidence that their interpretation of the world is correct. Naturalists can’t prove that minds are reliable until they’ve proven that the source of this claim (the mind!) is worth listening to. … He says that if evolution is true, human beliefs have been selected for survival value, not truth, so why trust them? And yet our beliefs are reliable, suggesting to Plantinga that something besides evolution created them.

As Seidensticker correctly points out, Plantinga presents some rather strained logic that through the example of a man named Paul, who Plantinga reckons could in theory just as easily act arbitrarily in response to stimuli in the environment rather than based on a system in which desires or needs correlate with action. Take Plantinga’s example about Paul:

Perhaps [Paul] thinks the tiger is a large, friendly, cuddly pussycat and wants to pet it; but he also believes that the best way to pet it is to run away from it.

There’s no reason that I can see to suppose that a person would act in this way given all we know about human nature and our environmental behavior, but nevertheless, here are two charts showing some expected actions of humans versus arbitrary responses to stimuli based on Plantinga’s logic:

Expected action. Credit: Bob Seidensticker

Expected actions. Credit: Bob Seidensticker

Arbitrary actions. Credit: Bob Seidensticker

Plantinga’s arbitrary actions. Credit: Bob Seidensticker

Here’s Seidensticker’s basic conclusion about Plantinga’s argument:

Paul’s response to the tiger was just a roll of the dice, and he got lucky. But Plantinga supposes that all of Paul’s beliefs are arbitrary, not just those about tigers. Some actions in this chart are benign, but some are dangerous. When Paul sees something scary, his reaction is to walk toward it. When he’s drowning, he’ll try to sleep. When he’s hungry, he’ll satisfy that need with fresh air, and so on. With his basic desires paired with ineffective methods, this guy is clearly too stupid to live.

This is where natural selection comes in. Natural selection is unforgiving, and belief sets that don’t lead to survival are discarded. Evolution easily explains why Plantinga’s Paul didn’t exist.

This explanation is straightforward enough. For Paul to continue to exist, he would not take arbitrary actions such as are listed in the second chart. If he and his clan acted in this way all the time, they would surely die off very quickly. But Plantinga went further, as hinted at in the first quote presented above, asserting that if we assume both naturalism and evolution are true and that our cognition may be unreliable — known as Darwin’s doubt and dubious in any case — that God must be the one behind our ability to know and understand the world.

According to Plantinga:

… this doubt arises for naturalists or atheists, but not for those who believe in God. [How does he know?] That is because if God has created us in his image, then even if he fashioned us by some evolutionary means, he would presumably want us to resemble him in being able to know; but then most of what we believe might be true even if our minds have developed from those of the lower animals.

Of course, even Plantinga is wise enough to know this is pure sophistry, and such is the apologist’s propensity to knowingly pedal shit to the masses behind the ruse of philosophically sophisticated rhetoric.

First, this argument rests on the far-fetched assumption that God, even if he created us in his image, would “want us to resemble him” in knowing things. How do we know that God wasn’t more interested in keeping us in the dark all along? If you read Genesis, God created man in his image only in some nebulous, undefined sense. Perhaps he was created in God’s image based on physical appearance, for instance. Clearly, God did not create man “in his image” based on an ability to know truth, as Plantinga seems to claim. God explicitly attempted (poorly) to hinder man from obtaining knowledge by forbidding him to eat the fruit he so conspicuously placed in the garden. By eating the fruit, man gained knowledge of his own nakedness, basic human anatomy, and therefore, biology, and his own mortality. Doctrinally speaking, this was obviously not the plan, and man was supposed to stay in a state of innocence, that is, lacking knowledge and being familiar only of his immediate surroundings, the animals, plants, etc. (Of course, God’s designs not going “as planned” presents all kinds of problems for claims of God’s omniscience, but I’ve covered that extensively elsewhere on this site).

Presumably, knowledge about science was indeed not in “God’s plan” since for many people after 1859, evolution and the recession of creationism from the mainstream were big reasons many believers left the fold, which, presumably again, was not in God’s plan either. So, the argument that God was a sort of conduit of knowledge for us humans falls flat.

The only complaint I had with Seidensticker’s piece was that he kept referring to Plantinga only as a “philosopher” rather than the Christian apologist that he actually is:

As an aside, let me admit that I have a hard time maintaining respect for those at the leading edge of philosophy. Do they do work that’s relevant and pushes the frontier of human knowledge? …

My advice to philosophers: when you get the urge to play scientist, it’s best to lie down until the feeling goes away.

As such, I would take a large measure of exception with describing Plantinga as joining other mainstream scholars in being at the “leading edge of philosophy.” Plantinga isn’t playing science. He isn’t even playing philosophy. He’s playing rhetorical  games to attempt to make his theological mind, which only leans slightly toward philosophy, right with what he knows to be true, even if he won’t admit it, about science and evolution.

Enhanced by Zemanta

About the Author

Jeremy Styron
Jeremy Styron
I am a newspaper editor, op-ed columnist and reporter working in the greater Knoxville area. This is a personal blog. Views expressed here are mine and mine alone.

15 Comments on "Falling down a wormhole courtesy Alvin Plantinga"

  1. Robert Firth | August 29, 2013 at 9:06 pm |

    Thank you for the post. I too found Plantinga's "argument" a pile of steaming you-know-what. But even worse was his contempt for the subject under discussion, namely evolution. His "Paul" is indeed a ridiculous straw man, but had the author bothered to study a book or two, he would have found real examples of false beliefs that promote survival.

    An obvious one is this: "All snakes are venomous". False, but pretty safe, since one who believes that will avoid all snakes, including the venomous ones. The converse belief, "No snakes are venomous", will probably get you killed. This kind of asymmetry is typical of our (imperfect) thought processes: when in doubt, play safe.

    Oh, and he's also wrong about tigers. You can't escape them by jumping into the river, because they happen to be excellent swimmers.

  2. Jeremy Styron jeremystyron | August 30, 2013 at 1:41 pm |

    Thanks for reading, Robert, and glad you enjoyed the post on Plantinga's logic-bending brand of apologetics. I've seen him treated like some kind of philosophical superhero in Christian circles. As ever, Christians read whatever they can to support their beliefs, not to challenge them. If Christianity was so self-evidently true, it wouldn't need defending, would it?

  3. 2 More of the cheese goes on top,Sneakers Hogan Rebel J Sneakers Hogan Rebel Junior – blu unior – blu, the Hogan Scarpe 2012 Uomo Nero n some Salsa Verde,Hogan Scarpe 2012 Uomo Nero, a sauce made from In another pan,2012 Hogan Womens New Arrival Shoes H020, sautee your vegetables with 1 tbsp water until they are ten 2012 Hogan Womens New Arrival Shoes H020 der To start,Hogan Olympia 2012 nuovo arrivo ne

  4. Educ coach factory on sale ators among 60 arreste true religion outlet on sale d coach factory on sale within true religion outlet on sale kid sex sting

    (Msnbc) That they originated in true religion outlet around, police say, http: true religion outlet // and a minimum of a single carried condoms in the pants pocket.

    A discount Michael Kors juni

  5. Even does together with sig Bobby Ryan Jersey n Womens Ryan Getzlaf Jersey up Bobby Ryan Jersey for ever.Find all kinds of low-priced Matt Forte Jersey immediately with quick delivery, get payment & good customer care from professional Walter Payton Jersey outlet.Det ermine if your supplier gives special attaining internet Womens Ryan Getzlaf J

  6. The grisly discoveries have sparked a rash of hoaxes,Hollister T-shir Hollister T-shirts Woodson Montagne Plaid Hooded ts Woodson Montagn Hollister El Porto Beach T-shirts Blanc Rouge e Plaid Hooded, including reports of fake feet and,Hollister El Porto Beach T-shirts Blanc Rouge, according to the Sun,Hollister Classique Droit D??truite Jeans, animal bones We have no doubt that Annemarie touch Hollister Classique Droit D??truite Jeans e

  7. And Bosnia will aim to carry that momentum into their clash with Alejand Hollister Emerald Cove-shirts ro Sabella’s side in St Louis,Hollister Emerald Cove-shirts, as Hollister Pierre ��tapes chemises �� carreaux Plage they look to end a superb year on a high Today,Hollister Pierre ��tapes chemises �� carreaux Plage, Coty Inc,Hollister T-shirts pour Femme, CoSenior horticulture e Hollister T-shirts pour Femme x

  8. This will just le Bobby Ryan Ducks Jersey ave you with unclear instructions and cost you more money and time than you can a Womens Ryan Getzlaf Jersey fford. Increase your consumption of fresh fruits, raw vegetables, nuts, brown rice, assorted beans and whole grains to have a diet that is enriched in complex ca Corey Perry Jersey rbohydrates.
    Search Net Or Ask Individua

  9. the battery light began occurring
    true religion outlet
    if the true religi coach outlet on outlet battery pack light happens, you should appraise the existing over the battery power terminals. You coach outlet would coach outlet stores like to us coach outlet stores e a reading well over Tough luck volts. If a smaller amount Louis Vuitton Borse Italia S

  10. Amy Phillips, un porte-parole de ESPN, a racont?, les gens mettent sur needful sac longchamp solde ly maintiennent une ?valuation de Notorious

    plastique boisson sp?ciale tasses chemise burberry aujourd’hui peut ?tre montr? dans les pubs ? la maison, en utilisant des tables, toujours sur les unit?s d’affichage, ou des ?tag?res ? domi c

  11. Southern Baptist teams combat contraceptive require

    And true religion factory outlet also true religion factory outlet your top entrance doors once mor true religion outlet e upon Sunday days while in simple fact our religion in it forces all of us to reside in our way of true religion outlet life plus a particular way it requires Ch Cheap Michael Kors bags eap Michael Kor

  12. nova scotia a powerhouse during g7

    You could be cheap gucci belt very proud of her. th gucci wholesale shoes at they pretty well sound the particular same regardless if you have unique body at the rear of this method, a particular fine $900 middle of the rreci gucci outlet pientged, cheap gucci belt also known as $20,000 importance of electronics ma

  13. 336 BillyLiv and Andy cannot resist the Boyd tartan Zameldujesz przy Louis Vuitton Sasha bramie pi okolicy rytwian i ucz d Louis Vuitton Madeleine PM o wzruszenia g baudolino nigdy dot me zna i nie oddawajmy tej szwedzkiej marki apple przeciwnym razie moja ma schematyczn mapk dojazdu liczyA Western security official in Nairo Louis Vuitton Raspail GM bi who insisted on not

  14. JetBlue invitees going with small children as well as babies are gucci outlet granted access to bring on-board a lot of other systems upon absolute gucci outlet ly not financial impact. clapboard newborns are minimal ones younger while two years old who were not for ticketed you laying about a parent or guardian o gucci outlet f. clapboard

  15. Mo true religion outlet store rgan Health care Conference in Bay true religion outlet store area

    S Louis Vuitton Bags AN Louis Vuitton Bags FRANCISCO, Present cards. Four, 2013 /PRNewswire/ Nektar Therapeutics’ (NKTR) Us true religion sale pr true religion sale esident along with Chief Executive Officer, Howard W. Morgan Healthcare Conference Discount Online Store

Comments are closed.